Orthopaedic Sports Medicine Center of Ioannina

“A modern and fully equipped facility”

Posterior cruciate ligament architecture: evaluation under microsurgical dissection.

Makris CA, Georgoulis AD, Papageorgiou CD, Moebius UG, Soucacos PN.

Arthroscopy;16(6):627-32, 2000

PURPOSE: Our objective was to verify the fiber anatomy of the posterior cruciate ligament (PCL) and to measure the main dimensions and the femoral and tibial attachment site distances of the ligament after microsurgical dissection. We hypothesized that PCL anatomy is more complex than the 2 traditionally characterized bands.

TYPE OF STUDY: This is a purely anatomic description of microdissections of the PCL, focused on the fine anatomy of the ligament.

MATERIALS AND METHODS: Twenty-four fresh-frozen cadaveric knees were dissected using magnifying loupes and an operative microscope, being careful to avoid creating artificially separated bundles. The main dimensions of the PCL were measured using a micrometer.

 RESULTS: The anterior, central, posterior-longitudinal, and posterior-oblique were the 4 fiber regions identified based on their orientation and the osseous sites of their insertions. These were partially separable anatomically but were functionally distinct. The anterior and central fiber regions made up the bulk of the ligament, while the remaining 15% consisted of the posterior fiber regions. During manual joint motion, the behavior of these fiber regions was observed. The anterior fiber region appeared to be the most nonisometric and remained in tension mainly between 30 degrees and 90 degrees of flexion. The posterior fiber regions appeared to be the most isometric (especially the posterior-oblique) and remained in tension mainly in extension and partially in deep flexion. The central fiber region appeared to have an intermediate behavior and remained in tension mainly between 30 degrees and 120 degrees of flexion. Additionally, it appeared to be the widest of all fiber regions. CONCLUSIONS: These findings should be of interest and help in interpreting some of the anatomy encountered during arthroscopic examination of the PCL, both from the anterior and posterior lateral portals. Furthermore, this information should prove useful in selecting treatment for the PCL.